domain logo

Before You Buy: SUVs That Fall Short in Key Are

The SUV market continues to grow, but not every model lives up to modern expectations. While many new releases boast impressive features, a handful still lag behind in areas that matter most to buyers. If you're shopping for an SUV soon, here are some categories—and specific models—that may give you second thoughts.

Lagging Technology Features

In an era where connectivity and convenience define the driving experience, some SUVs still feel stuck a few years behind. These vehicles often come with slow-responding touchscreens, outdated interfaces, or limited smartphone compatibility. Drivers who rely on seamless integration for navigation, music, or hands-free communication may find themselves frustrated by sluggish software or missing features.

Example: The 2025 Nissan Kicks S trim still uses a basic infotainment display with no wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, offering a noticeably pared-down experience compared to similarly priced rivals.

Tech shortcomings also extend to safety. Many entry-level SUVs skip essential driver-assistance systems that have become expected, such as lane-centering or adaptive cruise control.

Example: The base 2025 Jeep Compass Sport lacks several advanced safety systems that competitors now include as standard.

 

Weak Fuel Efficiency

Fuel economy remains a top priority for families, commuters, and eco-minded buyers. Despite this, some SUVs continue to burn more fuel than necessary. These models may deliver power, but the cost at the pump—and the environmental impact—can make them less appealing.

Example: The 2025 Chevrolet Tahoe 5.3L V8 version still posts below-average fuel efficiency for the full-size segment, trailing behind hybrid or smaller-displacement competitors.

For anyone driving long distances or watching their monthly budget, poor MPG ratings can quickly become a deal-breaker.

Tight Cargo Areas

One of the biggest selling points of an SUV is storage, yet a few models don’t provide the room buyers expect. Sleek exterior styling or sloping rooflines often reduce interior volume, making it harder to load travel gear, strollers, or sports equipment.

Example: The 2025 Toyota Corolla Cross offers a stylish build but falls short in cargo capacity, especially when compared to leading compact SUVs like the Honda CR-V.

When cargo limitations become noticeable during daily errands or family trips, the convenience factor diminishes quickly.

Stiff Riding and Limited Comfort

Ride quality can make or break the ownership experience. Some SUVs prioritize rugged looks or off-road capability but sacrifice comfort in the process. Firm suspensions, noisy cabins, or narrow seating can turn longer drives into a chore.

Example: The 2025 Ford Bronco (base model) offers plenty of adventure-ready capability but can feel bouncy and loud on regular pavement, especially compared to more refined family-focused SUVs.

Interior comfort matters just as much, and some models still rely on stiff seats or minimal padding.


 

Higher-Than-Average Maintenance Costs

Ownership costs go beyond the sticker price. Some SUVs require premium parts, frequent servicing, or specialized labor that drive up long-term expenses. Buyers looking for dependable, low-stress ownership should be cautious.

Example: The 2025 Volvo XC90 continues to receive mixed reliability feedback, with repairs and parts that can be more expensive than mainstream competitors.